How Does Centralized vs. Decentralized Medication Distribution Impact Design?
Bill Hinton, CNMT
Associate Principal, Senior Project Manager
In the past, most facilities used a centralized medication distribution methodology, but many facilities have now shifted to a decentralized model.
With a centralized distribution system, the pharmacy processes orders for medications and sends that day’s meds to the patient care areas. In this approach, medication rooms typically only store a few PRN (as needed) drugs, requiring only a single half-size automatic meds dispenser and half-size refrigerator.
In the decentralized approach, many more medications are kept within the medication room, to be dispensed by the nurse from doctors’ orders. In this scenario, multiple tower dispensers – main and auxiliary – are typically required in addition to the half-size refrigerator. Medication rooms housing multiple dispensers, counters with sinks, and wall storage can approach 160sf or more in size.
Other trends impacting design
Recent trends also include a change in responsibility for IV solutions from materials management to pharmacy, which translates into IV bag storage moving out of the clean supply room and into the medication room. Another trend is the storage of ancillary supplies associated with medication administration, such as IV tubing and syringes, to be housed in the medication room, requiring three to six feet of wall space.
Designing for flexibility
Although not all projects can accommodate the flexibility, planning the med rooms for a distributed system (even if the current method is centralized) can allow the pharmacy to change models in the future. We have experienced projects in which the facility switched from a centralized distribution to a decentralized distribution system after construction documents were issued. In one example, the resizing of a dozen medication rooms from 110sf to 165sf cascaded into a redesign of 43 additional spaces.
Notice: Trying to get property 'ID' of non-object in /var/www/vhosts/hykp-jlss.accessdomain.com/httpdocs/wp-content/themes/maz/content-authored.php on line 32
Aaron Schiess, PE
Associate, Senior Mechanical Engineer
Technology BIM Specialist
Angela Howell, BSN, RN
Medical Equipment Planner
Angelica Chow, PE, LEED AP BD+C
Anjali Wale, PE, LEED AP
Senior Associate, Senior Electrical Engineer
Arturo S Salud
Associate, Senior Electrical Designer
Austin Barolin, PE, CEM, LEED AP O&M
Senior Associate, Senior Energy Analyst
Bethany Beers, CCP, LEED AP BD+C
Senior Associate, Energy & Commissioning Consultant
Brennan Schumacher, LEED AP
Associate Principal, Lighting Design Lead
Brian Hageman, LEED AP
Associate Principal, Plumbing Discipline Lead
Brian Hans, PE, LEED AP
Associate Principal, Senior Mechanical Engineer
Brian J. Lottis, LEED AP BD+C
Associate, Senior Mechanical Designer
Brianne Copes, PE, LEED AP
Senior Associate, Mechanical Engineer
Principal, Director of Business Development, Mazzetti+GBA